Music & Nature: How do you feel now about a practical relationship between yourselves or Micro Music Laboratories^® and pharmaceutics?

Peter Hübner: Firstly, there would have to be mutual compromise. There is already full agreement on the fundamental issue of an objective scientific approach to medical methods and results and I also believe that pharmaceutics is open to the basic harmonic considerations; since they certainly wish to reduce the unwanted side-effects caused by their products. Without doubt they want to optimise the medical effect of their products and thirdly, they do not want to be steam-rolled by the competition or by time.

These are the basic pre-requisites of a relationship. I personally do not want to find myself in competition with pharmaceutics, nor to manoevre pharma­ceutics into the same situation, because I believe that even Medical Resonance Therapy Music^® cannot replace this branch of industry entirely. At the moment, there seems to be a more widespread insight into the laws of nature, and particularly in the harmonic laws of nature, in my particular area than in chemistry, and therefore in pharmaceutics.
It is my view that the starting points for harmonic research and development to achieve such a level of knowledge lie intelligently in the microcosm of music – provided it concerns only this special harmonic knowledge. The method of obtaining such knowledge on the harmonic laws of nature using chemical laboratories would seem by comparison more involved and therefore more difficult.

It may perhaps be possible to transfer harmonic knowledge from the microcosm of music to the field of chemistry – as Kepler described in astronomy when he derived his planet laws originally from the microcosm of music, applied them to astronomy and only found confirmation later through precise astronomic investigations.

Pythagoras also proposed this method fundamentally as it is quicker, simpler and less involved. The reason for this alone lies in the natural disposition of our hearing; we hear in the frame of mathematical functions.
But this situation brings with it its own problems; I recognise the fact that great demands are being placed on my time which means that I am transferring my scientific knowledge of music to the field of chemistry and in doing so, neglecting my work with music.

The other way would be for chemistry to tackle the first process of integrating harmonic laws into its area of science, and pharmaceutical applications and occasionally draw on the knowledge from the microcosm of music.
This would make chemistry, after music, the second largest discipline to integrate harmonic laws of nature into its fundamental knowledge.
This step cannot be avoided – just as my Medical Resonance Therapy Music^® was unable to avoid it, since chemical preparations are applied to biological systems and, biological systems function harmonically

Pythagoras had already recognised the harmonic functions of the biological system and modern chrono-medics have for a longtime been finding scientific proof for this fact.

Some sort of co-operation between Micro Music Laboratories^® and pharmaceutics or between myself and pharmacists would therefore be useful in helping to reduce costs and develop improved medicines and it would also help reduce unwanted side effects.

Music & Nature: And if your musical medical products squeeze pharmaceutics out in areas where they are simply superior, pharmaceutics can expect to suffer major losses.

Peter Hübner: Such problems will only occur if pharmaceutics continues to avoid such an important development. But I don`t think this is the case and I will do everything in my power to prevent such unintelligent, crass and undeserved competition between these two sectors of industry.